DOES POLITICAL HISTORY MAKE SENSE? EVOLUTION OF STATE AND ITS STUDIES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
State generates its own social and legal structures, which make up challenging research and practice areas. As a multidimensional phenomenon, State is subject to philosophy, history, sociology, psychology, law, political science, etc. Each science applies its own methods and tools to those aspects of State and Law that it focuses on. Yet, the exact subject area between the sciences that study State remains a notorious theoretical issue. The exact spectrum of sciences that form Doctrine of State is yet to be defined. A universal Theory of State might be a solution: it is a prospective umbrella science that covers all scientific stakeholders. This article is an interdisciplinary theoretical and methodological review of genesis, evolution, trends, and prospects of Doctrine of State. According to modern publications, the ultimate political system, i.e., an ideal state, is a futuristic model of non-state nature that has discarded the state form as archaic. Political history cannot explain why the State and its institutions are imperfect and how it can be improved. This problem is generated by the contradictory nature of humanity itself: it is intertwined with human history and can be resolved only beyond the boundaries of state history. This opinion should become a fundamental provision of Doctrine of State.

Keywords:
state, statehood, state law, constitutional law, state history, politics, political science, political science, progress, meaning of history, end of State
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Kerimov D. A., Kerimov A. D. State studies and methodology. Politics and Society, 2011, (11): 74–79. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pzuudv

2. Berdyaev N. A. The meaning of history. Moscow: Mysl, 1990, 170. (In Russ.)

3. Berk E. Government, politics, and society. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts; Kuchkovo pole, 2001, 478. (In Russ.)

4. Ellinek G. General Doctrine of State. St. Petersburg: Iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004, 752. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ryrvyl

5. Gessen V. M. The general doctrine of the State. St. Petersburg: Kassa vzaimopomoshchi studentov S.-Peterb. politekhn. in-ta imp. Petra Velikogo, 1912, 190. (In Russ.)

6. Chellen R. Political science, its relation to other research areas, and political space studies (Foreword by M. V. Ilyin). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2005, (2): 115–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.02.11

7. Burgess J. W. Political science and comparative constitutional law. Boston; London: Ginn and Company, 1913, 378.

8. Almond G. Political science: History of the discipline. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 1997, (6): 174–183. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/escoxv

9. Batalov E. Ya. American political thought of the XX century. Moscow: Progress, 2014, 621. (In Russ.)

10. Easton D. Political science in the united states: Past and present. Revue internationale de science politique, 1985, 6(1): 133–152.

11. Easton D. A new revolution in political science. Judgment Journal, 2015, 1(1). (In Russ.) URL: www.academia.edu/21597932 (accessed 5 Apr 2024).

12. Gadzhiev K. S. Political Science. Moscow: Logos, 2001, 488. (In Russ.)

13. Gutorov V. A. Politics: Science, philosophy, and education. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2011, 516. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tsieaz

14. Kozhevnikov V. V. About of the object of the theory state and law. Sovremennoe pravo, 2012, (6): 11–13. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/palhul

15. Kozhevnikov V. V. General theory of state and law: In defense of basic methodological legal science. Herald of Omsk University Series "Law", 2018, (4): 72–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25513/1990-5173.2018.4.72-79

16. Theory of State and Law, ed. Alekseev S. S. Moscow: Norma, 2005, 495. (In Russ.)

17. Vengerov A. B. Theory of State and Law. 3rd ed. Moscow: Omega-L, 2006, 608. (In Russ.)

18. Issues of General Theory of Law and State, ed. Nersesiants V. S. Moscow: Norma, 2004, 832. (In Russ.)

19. Matuzov N. I., Malko A. V. Theory of State and Law. 5th ed. Moscow: Delo, 2020, 528. (In Russ.)

20. Perevalov V. D. Theory of State and Law. 5th ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2024, 341. (In Russ.)

21. Syrykh V. M. Theory of State and Law. 6th ed. Moscow: Iustitsinform, 2012, 704. (In Russ.)

22. Marchenko M. N. Theory of State and Law. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospekt, 2009, 636. (In Russ.)

23. Pigolkin A. S., Golovistikova A. N., Dmitriev Yu. A. Theory of State and Law. 4th ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2024, 516. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ldvuml

24. Protasov V. N. Special Theory of State and Law. Journal of Russian Law, 2005, (8): 77–85. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/opctxv

25. Ilyin I. A. General Doctrine of Law and State. In: Ilyin I. A. Theory of State and Law. 2nd ed. Moscow: Zertsalo, 2008, 550. (In Russ.)

26. Alekseev N. N. Essays on General Theory of State. The main prerequisites and hypotheses of state science. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2008, 216. (In Russ.)

27. Selivanov A. I. Introduction to Russian Philosophy of State and Law. History of State and Law, 2010, (17): 8–15. (In Russ.)

28. Kerimov D. A. Methodological functions of the Philosophy of Law. State and Law, 1995, (9): 15–22. (In Russ.)

29. Shershenevich G. F. Philosophy of Law: Theory. General Theory of Law. Moscow, 1912, vol. 1, 699–805 (In Russ.)

30. Nurgaleev Sh. Kh., Likhachev G. D. Philosophy of Law in the system of law sciences. Juridical Education and Science, 2006, (1): 27–29. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/kueeor

31. Likhachev G. D. Conceptual structure of Philosophy of Law. History of State and Law, 2007, (14): 4–5. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/jxdlmb

32. Nersesyants V. S. Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Norma, 2005, 656. (In Russ.)

33. Alekseev S. S. Law: Basics, theory, and philosophy: A complex study. Moscow: Statut, 1999, 712. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rmlyff

34. Almond G., Powell G., Strom K., Dalton R. Comparative Politics Today. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2002, 535. (In Russ.)

35. Kuzmin I. A. Political science of law within the system of legal research (articulation of the problem). Law and politics, 2021, (4): 25–35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2021.4.35547

36. Mizulin M. Yu. Political Science of Law: Basics and principles. Public space, civil society, and government: Development and interaction, ed. Sungurov A. Yu. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2008, 246–258. (In Russ.)

37. Smirnov V. V. Political science of human rights and political rights in Russia. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2010, (6): 106–115. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/mvpcz

38. Sungurov A. Yu., Semikova A. E. Legal political science or political science of law: The outline of research field. Social sciences and contemporary world, 2017, (5): 83–93. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zfmkwp

39. Berdyaev N. A. Philosophy of inequality. In: Berdyaev N. A. Philosophy of Freedom. Moscow: AST, 2007, 449–699. (In Russ.)

40. Chicherin B. N. Political issue in Russia. Russian philosophers on the national and state development of Russia (1861–1940): Russia on the eve of the XX century: State Science and Politics of Russia in B. N. Chicherin’s Creative Heritage, ed. Savinkin A. E. Moscow: GA VS, 1992, 195–229. (In Russ.)

41. Hayek F. Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Moscow: IRISEN, 2006, 642. (In Russ.)

42. Spengler O. Decline of Europe. Essays on morphology of world history. Moscow: Mysl, 1998, 666. (In Russ.)

43. McIlwain C. H. Constitutionalism. Ancient and Modern. Ithaca; NY: Cornell University Press, 1947, 162.

44. Rothbard M. For a new liberty: The libertarian manifesto. Moscow: Novoe izd-vo, 2009, 396. (In Russ.)

45. Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Moscow: AST, 2007, 588. (In Russ.)

46. Alekseev N. N. Current Science of State and its immediate tasks. In: Alekseev N. N. The Russian people and the State. Moscow: Agraf, 2003, 386–625. (In Russ.)

47. Veber M. Politics as a vocation and profession. In: Veber M. Selected works. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 644–707. (In Russ.)

48. Duverger M. Political parties. Moscow: Akad. proekt, 2000, 538. (In Russ.)

49. Ilyin I. A. Prerequisites for creative democracy. In: Ilyin I. A. Why we believe in Russia. Moscow: Eksmo, 2006, 5–10. (In Russ.)

50. Schumpeter J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1995, 539. (In Russ.)

51. Ilyin I. A. Essence of legal awareness. In: Ilyin I. A. Theory of State and Law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 2008, 310–550 (In Russ.)

52. Ilyin I. A. The problem of modern legal consciousness: A public speech delivered at the opening of the Russian Scientific Institute in Berlin on February 17, 1923. Berlin: Press, 1923, 32. (In Russ.)

53. Novgorodtsev P. I. Introduction to Philosophy of Law. Crisis of modern legal awareness. St. Petersburg: Lan, 2000, 347. (In Russ.)

54. Berman  G. The Western tradition of law: The era of formation. 2nd ed. Moscow: MSU, 1998, 624. (In Russ.)

55. Kondratyeva M. K. The idea of progress in the context of modern discourse. Ideas and ideals, 2021, 3(3-1): 176–187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2021-13.3.1-176-187

56. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A. Constitutional futurology and constitutional futurism in the context of global changes. State and Law, 2021, (5): 81–93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520014855-1

57. Umnova-Konyukhova I. A. Generology and futurology of law: Trends and forecasts. Moscow: RAS, INION, 2023, 161. (In Russ.)

58. Lenin V. I. State and Revolution: Marxist Doctrine of State and Tasks of Proletariat in Revolution. Moscow: Mysl, 1977, 249. (In Russ.)


Login or Create
* Forgot password?