SUGAR VS. SUGAR SUBSTITUTES IN CONDENSED DAIRY PRODUCTS: ELECTRON MICROSCOPY AND RHEOLOGY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
Publications on functional condensed dairy foods focus on the formulation without considering the intermolecular interaction between a particular sweetener and casein micelles. Consequently, the structuring processes remain largely understudied. Electron microscopy and rheological studies may provide important data about the structure and mechanics of this interaction. This article introduces a comparative structural analysis of a condensed dairy product with sugar and its low-calorie substitute allulose. The research included fresh and 14-month-old original prodct with sugar and its experimental samples where sucrose was substituted with 40 and 60% allulose. The structural analysis involved the methods of electron microscopy and rheology. The physicochemical parameters and sensory profile were studied using standard methods. The electron-microscopic studies of the structures formed by casein micelles showed that 40% allulose had no effect on their morphometry. However, replacing 60% sucrose with allulose destroyed casein micelles, encapsulating them with saccharide and forming dense aggregates, which spoiled the sensory and physicochemical quality of the final product. The excessive fluidity of the product was due to a 27% decrease in viscosity. In this study, replacing more than 40% of conventional sweetener with allulose damaged the quality of the functional condensed dairy product.

Keywords:
Dairy products, allulose, sucrose, casein, quality, storage
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Xia Y, Cheng Q, Mu W, Hu X, Sun Z, et al. Research advances of D-allulose: An overview of physiological functions, enzymatic biotransformation technologies, and production processes. Foods. 2021;10(9):2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092186

2. Van Laar ADE, Grootaert C, Van Camp J. Rare mono- and disaccharides as healthy alternative for traditional sugars and sweeteners? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2021;61(5):713–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1743966

3. Mu W, Zhang W, Feng Y, Jiang B, Zhou L. Recent advances on applications and biotechnological production of D-psicose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;94:1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4093-1

4. Petrov SM, Podgornova NM, Tuzhilkin VI. Monosaccharide allulose as healthy alternative to traditional sugars and sweeteners. Sahar. 2023;(3):36–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2413-5518-2023-3-36-41

5. Jiang S, Xiao W, Zhu X, Yang P, Zheng Z, et al. Review on D-Allulose: In vivo metabolism, catalytic mechanism, engineering strain construction, bio-production technology. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8:00026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00026

6. Adolphus K, Van den Abbeele P, Poppe J, Deyaert S, Baudot A, et al. D-Allulose and erythritol increase butyrate production and impact the gut microbiota in healthy adults and adults with type-2 diabetes ex vivo. Beneficial Microbes. 2025;16(5):573–591. https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00071

7. Zhao Y, Duan X, Zhang J, Ding Y, Liu Q. Advances in the bioproduction of D-allulose: A comprehensive review of current status and future prospects. Food Research International. 2025;202:115767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115767

8. Hu M, Li M, Jiang B, Zhang T. Bioproduction of D-allulose: Properties, applications, purification, and future perspectives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2021;20(6):6012–6026. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12859

9. Zhang W, Chen D, Chen J, Xu W, Chen Q, et al. D-allulose, a versatile rare sugar: Recent biotechnological advances and challenges. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2023;63(22):5661–5679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.2023091

10. Xie X, Li C, Ban X, Yang H, Li Z. D-allulose 3-epimerase for low-calorie D-allulose synthesis: Microbial production, characterization, and applications. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2025;45(2):353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2024.2368517

11. Chen Z, Gao X-D, Li Z. Recent advances regarding the physiological functions and biosynthesis of D-allulose. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:881037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.881037

12. Li W, Zhu Y, Jiang X, Zhang W, Guang C, et al. One-pot production of D-allulose from inulin by a novel identified thermostable exoinulinase from Aspergillus piperis and Dorea sp. D-allulose 3-epimerase. Process Biochemistry. 2020;99:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.08.021

13. Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Luan H, Zhang X, Liu M, et al. Advances in the biosynthesis of D-allulose. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2024;40:375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04166-w

14. Tan JH, Chen A, Bi J, Lim YH, Wong FT, et al. The engineering, expression, and immobilization of epimerases for D-allulose production. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(16):12703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612703

15. Li Z, Feng L, Chen Z, Hu Y, Fei K, et al. Efficient enzymatic synthesis of D-allulose using a novel D-allulose-3-epimerase from Caballeronia insecticola. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2023;103(1):339–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12147

16. Laksmi FA, Nirwantono R, Nuryana I, Agustriana E. Expression and characterization of thermostable D-allulose 3-epimerase from Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus (Ap DAEase) with potential catalytic activity for bioconversion of D-allulose from D-fructose. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2022;214:426–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.117

17. Li Z, Hu Y, Yu C, Fei K, Shen L, et al. Semi-rational engineering of D-allulose 3-epimerase for simultaneously improving the catalytic activity and thermostability based on D-allulose biosensor. Biotechnology Journal. 2024;19(8):2400280. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202400280

18. Hu M, Li M, Jiang B, Zhang T. Bioproduction of D‐allulose: Properties, applications, purification, and future perspectives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2021;20(6):6012–6026. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12859

19. Sun Y, Hayakawa S, Ogawa M, Fukada K, Izumori K. Influence of a rare sugar, D-psicose, on the physicochemical and functional properties of an aerated food system containing egg albumen. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56(12):4789–4796. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf800050d

20. Woodbury TJ, Mauer LJ. Investigation of oligosaccharides and allulose as sucrose replacers in low-moisture wire-cut cookies. Food Research International. 2024;192:114844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114844

21. Men Y, Zhu P, Zhu Y, Zeng Y, Yang J, et al. The development of low-calorie sugar and functional jujube food using biological transformation and fermentation coupling technology. Food Science & Nutrition. 2019;7(4):1302–1310. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.963

22. Xie X, Yu L, Lin Q, Huang D. Low-calorie D-allulose as a sucrose alternative modulates the physicochemical properties and volatile profile of sponge cake. Journal of Food Science. 2024;89(10):6296–6307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17340

23. Liu F, Chen S, Pan F, Zhao Z, Liu M, et al. Establishment of the biotransformation of D-allulose and D-allose systems in full-red jujube monosaccharides. Plants. 2023;12(17):3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173084

24. Kurenkov SA, Kurenkova LA, Gnezdilova AI. Study of physicochemical properties of an alternative sugar substitute for the production of canned dairy products with sugar. Izvestiya vuzov. Food Technology. 2024;(5–6):21–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26297/0579-3009.2024.5-6.3

25. Kurenkova LA, Kurenkov SA. Study of the possibility of replacing sucrose with an alternative osmotically active substance in the technology of concentrated canned milk with sugar. Molochnokhozayistvenny Vestnik. 2023;(4):189–198. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/PJXDLW


Login or Create
* Forgot password?